Responses

Estimated global and regional incidence and prevalence of herpes simplex virus infections and genital ulcer disease in 2020: mathematical modelling analyses
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Response to Comment

    We sincerely thank the reader for their interest in our article and for drawing attention to the important issue of HSV infections among people living with HIV (PLHIV). We fully agree that the epidemiology of HSV-1 and HSV-2 infections can differ markedly between PLHIV and the general population, and that coinfection—particularly the interplay between HSV-2 and HIV—has important clinical and public health implications, including for HIV acquisition, transmission, and disease progression. These interactions have been a major focus of our prior work and have been addressed extensively in numerous previous publications.
    The present study was designed with a specific scope: to generate global and regional estimates of HSV-1 and HSV-2 infections in the total population, using the best available epidemiological data. Unfortunately, the global data landscape remains too limited to support robust modeling of HSV infections specifically among PLHIV or other key subpopulations. In particular, population-level data disaggregated by HIV status are lacking across most regions of the world.
    In summary, the absence of HIV-specific estimates in this analysis does not reflect a lack of recognition of their importance. On the contrary, we have addressed HSV–HIV interactions in earlier studies and remain committed to investigating these important dynamics in future research.

    Professor Laith Abu-Raddad, Ph.D.
    Weill Cornell Medicine – Qatar
    Cornell University...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Incidence and prevalence of Herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 and genital ulcer disease (GUD)
    • Prof Sarman Singh, Director Aarupadai Veedu Medical College & Hospital, Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation (Deemed University), Pondicherry, India

    I read with great interest a recently published article by Harfouche et al, in the STI.1 The authors have used mathematical modelling to estimate the global and regional burden of Herpes simplex virus -1 (HSV-1) and Herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2). I find a serious concern that authors have not provided any information about or proposed model to estimate the incidence and prevalence of HSV-1 and HSV-2 in people living with HIV. This information, and model if any, would be very crucial; as the prevalence and incidence of these viruses especially that of HSV-2, varies significantly in people living with HIV as compared to in those who are living without HIV.2 Not only incidence and prevalence of HSV-2 is different in these two populations but the coinfection of these viruses has important role in HIV pathogenesis and AIDS disease progression. In a recent study we reported that overall prevalence of HSV-1 in Indian adult males was 75.2%. Of these, 68.18% were males living with HIV. The prevalence of HSV-1 in people living with HIV was 77.2% and 71.2% in males without HIV. The difference was not statistically significant. The prevalence increased with age, from 60% in males aged <25 years to 86% in older subjects (P = 0.0188). The overall prevalence of HSV-2 was 28.20% in Indian males. However, the prevalence of HSV-2 in people living with HIV was 39.9% while in males without HIV, it was only 5.1%. The prevalence of HSV-2 in patients living with HIV increased with age, f...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.